Production Freaks

Add a Comment

Comment by Roy P. Cunningham on August 24, 2010 at 2:18pm

I'm listening to some demo material from Duane Richard... interesting....
Anyway... I'm always fascinated by folks who use SONY VEGAS for audio production. Is it the older version? I have VEGAS 7 and use it extensively for video storyboarding and paste up....
I think SONY ACID PRO 7 is way cooler...but I'm intrigued at the reason you specify VEGAS. is it for audio alone?

Comment by Jake Redman on August 20, 2010 at 3:17pm

I use Pro-Tools at the office (because I HAVE to) but have been using Vegas for everything else. I can only imagine how fast things could be turned around at work...WAY more efficient than PT or AA in my opinion.

Comment by Kevin Collins on March 23, 2010 at 2:47pm

check out http://audacity.sourceforge.net It's easy and FREE.

Comment by ARMANDO TALAVERA on March 23, 2010 at 2:38pm

I completely agree with you Kevin. For dry voice I like to use WaveLab (from Stainberg), because it allows you to have your plug-ins over the audio without applying them, but the editing is not the fastest.
Do you know other software that can do something similar? (not pro tools please).

Comment by Kevin Collins on March 23, 2010 at 1:36pm

Armando,
I have used them all. I have to say that Vegas is the best. What I do is close the video parts and only use the audio, to me it seems the it make vegas stronger and quicker. If I am only doing dry reads Cool edit 2.1 is my work horse.

Comment by ARMANDO TALAVERA on March 21, 2010 at 5:01pm

Hello,
I've used Pro Tools and AA, both really good, but my favorite of all times is Sony Vegas. Very user friendly and to me, it helps do everything much faster on the multitrack. It doesn't have an internal processor, but I can go back and forth from my preferred editor like AA or Sound Forge.Plus the rendering on Sony Vegas is really fast. ANY ONE ELSE USING SONY VEGAS?

Comment by Walt Marsicano on February 1, 2010 at 7:14pm

Jeff, I have both Adobe Audition & Pro-Tools. For day to day stuff, AA works great. It opens quick and you can be in & out in minutes. I've found that AA can be as complex or basic as you want it to be. And it incorporates many of the best plug-ins very well. I find myself using Pro-tools for larger complex projects or for reoccurring projects that involve many elements.
But in this day and age, there are LOTS of editors out there and many of them good. So it's whatever you get used to.

Comment by John Iron on May 18, 2009 at 11:29am

I do most of my work with audition on an XP machine, but I also have it on my Vista laptop for those rare times when I have to edit when outside of the studio and I've never had any conflicts with Audition and Vista.

Comment by Brian Whitaker on May 18, 2009 at 11:07am

Im thinking about upgrading to a newer computer (PC). I've heard a rumor that Adobe Audition does not work on Windows Vista (Im using XP now). Any truth to that? Any Audition users out there that are using AA on Vista?

Thanks! BW

Comment by Jeff Berlin on October 7, 2008 at 3:02pm

What's the best digital audio editor?

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page